Current:Home > MyFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Ascend Finance Compass
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Chainkeen View
Date:2025-04-06 11:34:49
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (44759)
Related
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- The Supreme Court rules against USPS in Sunday work case
- The Sweet Way Cardi B and Offset Are Celebrating Daughter Kulture's 5th Birthday
- Black-owned radio station may lose license over FCC 'character qualifications' policy
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Western tribes' last-ditch effort to stall a large lithium mine in Nevada
- Carlee Russell admits disappearance, 'missing child' reported on Alabama highway, a hoax, police say
- How saving water costs utilities
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Inside Clean Energy: Some EVs Now Pay for Themselves in a Year
Ranking
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Over $200 billion in pandemic business loans appear to be fraudulent, a watchdog says
- Congress Urges EPA to Maintain Clean-Air Regulations on Chemical Recycling of Plastics
- What the Vanderpump Rules Cast Has Been Up to Since Cameras Stopped Rolling
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Remember Reaganomics? Freakonomics? Now there's Bidenomics
- Republican attacks on ESG aren't stopping companies in red states from going green
- CoCo Lee's Husband Bruce Rockowitz Speaks Out After Her Death at 48
Recommendation
In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
Home prices dip, Turkey's interest rate climbs, Amazon gets sued
Gambling, literally, on climate change
Surfer Mikala Jones Dead at 44 After Surfing Accident
Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
The FAA is investigating the latest close-call after Minneapolis runway incident
New Jersey Joins Other States in Suing Fossil Fuel Industry, Claiming Links to Climate Change
Denver psychedelics conference attracts thousands